NID: National Inventory of Dams Database February 2005 SUMMARY: The National Inventory of Dams database is a great basic CAR dataset. The data is Collected by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and includes dam maintenance and safety records, structure,composition and owner. This update includes records for almost 80,000 dams. This update includes data through collected through 2002. Rebecca Ragon of the USACE has this to say about this update: "After 2002, no new data was requested or collected. The NID funding was cut back and the Corps concentrated on resolving duplicate submittals in 2003-2004 instead of publishing the NID data. The Corps should be requesting dam data later this year (2005) and we hope to keep the NID update cycles to about every 2 years." STORIES: The following stories used National Inventory of Dams database. Call (573) 884-7711 to order this database. In 2004,WEWS-Cleveland reported: Summary Ron Regan of WEWS-Cleveland found that at least 450 of Ohio's 1,700 dams are considered unsafe. Dams have to be inspected once every five years by state officials, and some of the "high hazard" dams have no emergency plan as required by the federal government. In 2000, Time Magazine reported: Summary A Time investigation finds that dams built in the 20th century have been responsible for some of the worst environmental tragedies in history. The ongoing devastation of most of the West Coast salmon fisheries south of Canada, the gradual disappearance of coastal Louisiana, and the salting out of millions of hectares through irrigation illustrate only some of the deadly effects. "In ways direct and indirect, playing God with water has had a tendency to bite us back," the magazine reports. The story reveals that even though some states' economies are hopelessly dependent on the manipulation of water, governments have started removing the dams. In 1995, the Atlantic Monthly reported: Summary More than 100,000 dams regulate American rivers and creeks, Atlantic Monthly reports. But the progress which dams epitomized has been called into question by experts. Making rivers navigable for barges costs taxpayers millions in subsidies, which often benefits the largest companies the most. Lobbyists have kept these subsidies high. Damage is also done by flooding that occurs as a result of dams. The environment suffers many different kinds of reactions. "If water policy gets dragged kicking and screaming into the age of limits, we'll probably find we have more than enough water to go around," the magazine reports. In 1995, NBC News Dateline reported: Summary Dateline conducted a four-month computer-assisted investigation of the nation's aging and failing dams. The report exposed the fact that thousands of dams are precariously close to collapse and that nearly half the people that died in the 1994 Georgia floods were found downstream from broken dams. (June 27, 1995) In 1997 KOMU TV (Columbia, Missouri) reported: Summary By national standards, 1,228 dams in Missouri should have Emergency Action Plans to help with the evacuation of people living downstream if the dam should fail. According to the state's own records, only 33 do. When KOMU tried to verify that at least those 33 actually did have the plans on file, only three were found. In 2000, Sierra Magazine reported: Summary This article examines the life of salmon and how "four obsolete dams are all that stand in the way of salmon surging back to the interior West." In 1999, Montreal Gazette reported: Summary After a violent storm exposed potentially life-threatening flaws in the world's biggest dam complex in Canada's Far North, this two-year investigation reveals the dam's Quebec-based owner concealed the damage when spending $100 million to quietly repair it. Neglect of the dam, which supplies up to 25% of New York and New England's electricity, resulted in severe losses from the 1998 storm. THE DATA: The 2005 update includes: Nid2005.dbf -- This is the main file Readme05.txt --- You are reading it. Datadict05.txt -- This is a description of all the fields. Layout05.txt -- This is the record layout for the table. Legal05.txt -- Legal information, terms and conditions. NOTES: * The NIDID is the unique id for each dam. There do not appear to be any duplicate records, but to be safe, you could combine the NIDID and the Recordid to ensure the unique ID. Bob Bank (former USACE contact) said the Congressional District and the Congressional Person are not used for this database because they are geographically based by the location of the dam. These fields are entered in a geographical database not the inventory database. NEW FIELD: submit_date: From Rebecca Ragon: "The 'submit_date' field is the date the states and federal agencies submitted data to the Corps. The dates are several years old because we asked for data back in 2002. After 2002, no new data was requested or collected. The NID funding was cut back and the Corps concentrated on resolving duplicate submittals in 2003-2004 instead of publishing the NID data. The Corps should be requesting dam data later this year and we hope to keep the NID update cycles to about every 2 years." *Note that several fields can include more than one code. For example, the foundation field includes both matter and certainty codes. The codes are very clearly marked in the DATA DICTIONARY. QUESTIONS: For technical questions about the data, please contact: Rebecca Ragon, US Army Topographic Engineering Center, e-mail: rragon@tec.army.mil For policy questions about the National Inventory of Dams, please contact: Anthony Niles, HQ US Army Corps of Engineers, e-mail: Anthony.Niles@usace.army.mil Lori Spragens, Association of State Dam Safety Officials, e-mail: lspragens@damsafety.org National Institute of Computer-Assisted Reporting 138 Neff Annex Columbia, MO 65201 573-884-7711